• Desco
  • EMIT
  • ESD Systems.com
  • Menda Pump
  • Menda-ID
  • Protektive Pak
  • SCS
  • Smart Clock
  • Special Team
  • Statguard Flooring

Your ESD Flooring Solutions Provider
000 Checkout

Added to your cart

You do not have any items in your shopping cart at this time.
View All cart items

  Shop from our other Desco
  Industries websites:

Europe

United Kingdom

Asia

Questions And Answers

# List All Questions Search List by Category
Question I understand that the ESDA standard for checking footwear call for specification of RTG at 1 x 106 - 1 x 109. (ESDs9.1-1995) If the lowest range acceptable for footwear is 1 x 106 ohm , why is it most of the footchecker found in the market has a lowest range at 800 kohm @900 kohm and not 1 mohm ? (like the one sold by simco, dou yee, etc...) say for example a shoe has a RTG at 9 x 105. This will mean that it will pass the shoes checker which has the lowest range at 800kohm but will not pass the one which has the lowest range at 1 x 106. (like the one sold by Semtronics EN625) -June Tan, Selangor, Malaysia
Answer Actually, the ANSI/ESD-S20.20-1999 recommends that the resistance for footwear be less than 1x109 ohms and do not specify a lower range. In this case, footwear is referred to as shoes only and does not include foot grounders.

For foot grounders, the ANSI/ESD-S20.20-1999 recommends that the system resistance of the floor and the wearer be less than 35 megohms (35x106 ohms) and again does not specify a lower range.

In both cases the lower range is really dictated by the application and safety concerns. Regarding safety, UL will only list products that include a lower resistance boundary of 1 megohm using currently available technology. Current technology readily has available carbon film resistors with a tolerance of +/- 10%. This would mean the minimum resistance you could run into would be 900 kilohms (- 10% of 1 megohm). Add to this the tolerance of the measuring unit/system and you could have a range as wide as 15 to 20 %.

Related Categories:
 
If you have found this Q/A useful, please rate it based on its helpfulness.
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
This question has been rated: 0%0%
(0% at 0 Ratings)