MENU
Toggle navigation
Products
FreeStyle 8400™ Interlocking Floor System
ESD Vinyl Tile
8400 Series Conductive ESD Vinyl Tile
8400 Series Dissipative ESD Vinyl Tile
FreeStyle 8400 Interlocking Flooring System
7900 Series Conductive ESD Vinyl Tile
Modular Conductive Interlocking Floor Tile
ESD Modular Carpet Tiles
Colonial Series
Discovery Eco Series
Landmark Series
Presidential Series
Adhesive and Grounding Strips
Conductive Rubber Tiles and Rolls
Conductive Adhesive, Grounding and Weld Rod
Dissipative Floor Finishes
Statguard® Low-VOC Dissipative Floor Finish
Statguard® Dissipative Floor Finish
Statguard® Floor Label
ESD Floor Maintenance Products
Statguard® Floor Stripper
Statguard® Floor Neutralizer
Statguard® ESD Floor Cleaner
Statfree® Dissipative Spray Buff
Statfree® Burnishing Restorer
Measurement Meters
Conductive Epoxy
Charge-Guard™ Conductive Epoxy
Statguard Conductive Epoxy
New Products
Resources
Partners
Webinar
Videos
REGISTER / LOGIN
SHOP
CART (
0
)
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR EMAIL LIST - Be the first to know
about exclusive deals, tips, new products & more!
Questions And Answers
#
1015
List All Questions
Search
List by Category
Question
When transporting PCBs in the manufacturing process, is there a significant difference between using conductive bins versus dissapative bins?
We are currently using conductive bins. Would it be cost effective or necessary to switch to dissapative?
- Anonymous, Madison, WI
Answer
The answer depends on how the bins are used in conjunction with your control program and the handling of your sensitive electronic devices. If all conductors are grounded, including personnel, carts, benches, floors, etc. and the control program is properly executed and well disciplined, then conductive bins may be okay for continued use.
The safest answer is that dissipative surfaces are preferred over conductive ones for ESD Control in the electronics industry. Conductive is defined as having a surface resistance below 1x10^4 ohms. When a surface is too conductive, a charged device can easily discharge (undergo an ESD event) upon contact with a conductive surface whether it is grounded or not. This is the threat of the Charge Device Model, where a charged device comes into contact with a conductive material and discharges (an ESD event occurs).
ESD Protected Workstations ESD-ADV53.1 Electrical Requirements, Electrical Requirements. Workstation elements shall be connected to, and maintain electrical continuity to, the common point ground as follows: Worksurfaces - Resistance: Between 1 x 10^6 ohms and 1 x 10^9 ohms; Surfaces of shelves and drawers intended to be used for unprotected ESD sensitive devices - Resistance: Between 1 x 10^6 ohms and 1 x 10^9 ohms; Personnel Ground Connection Point - Resistance: less than 1 ohm; Support Structure - Resistance: less than 1 ohm
From ESD S4.1, standard on Worksurfaces - Resistance Measurements
paragraph 8. Resistance Guidelines Due to wide variety of applications for worksurfaces, specific requirements that could be broadly applied are difficult to determine. However, the following set of guidelines can be used as a starting point for establishing local requirements for the resistance of worksurfaces.
Resistance-to-groundable point 1 x 10^6 to 1 x 10^9 ohms.
You can line the bins with a dissipative matting such as Type T2 to minimize the exposure of conductive surfaces or package the devices in Static Dissipative Bags when stored in conductive bins.
Most ESD Control programs are very good at protecting themselves from the Human Body Model (HBM), but not the Charge Device Model (CDM). The use of dissipative mats, surfaces and packaging material greatly reduces the problem of CDM.
Related Categories:
Discharge Times
Packaging
If you have found this Q/A useful, please rate it based on its helpfulness.
This question has been rated:
(
100
% at
1
Ratings)