Questions And Answers

# List All Questions Search List by Category
Question I have a question that has been brought up by our assemblers that are under ESD guidelines while assembling electronic components. During hot weather, is there a suitable substitute for the protective smock? The question was raised when we saw a ESD video showing some of the personnel with an apron on while handling electronic boards. Any information that you have would be helpful. -Anonymous
Answer Thank you for your inquiry. Please consider us a resource to provide technical information to help you to optimize your ESD control program. We can be your staff. We sell ESD Smocks and Lab Coats, but it is your call on whether they are required in your operation. See the ESD Association web site http://www.esda.org/ and the new ESD Program Standard ANSI/ESD S20.20-1999 which can be downloaded at no-charge from http://www.esda.org/ My point is that the technical elements have some “hard” requirements, but include many options for compliance that will allow users to develop and implement a plan for their application that is technically adequate and cost effective. An effective ESD control program requires thoroughness. All the expense and effort is for naught if there is a weak link and a product, protected throughout most of the manufacturing/transit/storage cycle, is damaged in just one of the many stations. In addition to individual worker ESD protection, using ESD Smocks can be very effective in gaining compliance from workers being the single most powerful step to demonstrate management commitment to the ESD control program.

With or without an ESD Smock, the worker with a properly grounded wrist strap will have generated charges removed from their person via their skin as the electrical conductive path. Even so they can have charges on their clothing that are isolated and do not have a path to ground. If this charged clothing comes in close proximity or into contact with an ESD sensitive device, a charge can be induced to the device, or a discharge can occur.

Wearing the ESD Smock, with cuffs at wrists & buttoned up, a Faraday Cage is created where such charges will be kept to the inside of the Smock fabric & if contact is made with panel to panel conductivity will remove the charge. However, you would have much less tribocharging if your employees were nude and you had them work on dirt floors. Very high charge generation occurs in a low humidity environment, with workers wearing synthetic shoes and clothing walking across carpeted floors.

The former specification EIA-625 in section 11 required a 12” minimum distance from ESD sensitive devices. [Note: Since an electric field has a range of 1/R^2 then the charge at 12” will be 144 times smaller than at 1”]. It reads: “Methods for Minimizing Static Charging, Static charge prevention actions shall be utilized at ESD protected areas and workstations where static voltages greater than 200+/- volts are measured and unprotected ESDS devices are within twelve (12) inches of the charged sources.” You could amend your written ESD control plan deleting the requirement to wear ESD Smocks in your ESD protected areas. You would first want to measure the actual electrostatic charges generated by using a Digital Field Meter. Also, you should observe in your operations, how close does worker clothing come to ESDS devices.

Depending upon the susceptibility of the EDS sensitive devices that you are working on, and the cost to administer ESD control program changes, you can consider the following: 1) Require ESD smocks when humidity is under a certain level              2) Require ESD Smock if worker is wearing synthetic upper body clothing such as polyester, rayon, etc., but not require ESD Smocks if wearing upper body clothing such as cotton, wool, etc. 3) Not require ESD Smocks if worker has no clothing on upper body. 4) Require ESD aprons but with workers wearing sleeveless upper body garments. 5) Not require ESD Smocks, but require that worker clothing be kept a minimum of one foot from ESD sensitive devices.

Related Categories:
 
If you have found this Q/A useful, please rate it based on its helpfulness.
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
This question has been rated: 93%93%93%93%93%93%
(93% at 3 Ratings)